IN THE FORUMS >> VIEWS REPLIES  
  ■  OT: Other Sports 3367 423  
  ■  Game 8: New York Islanders @ New York Rangers 1... 1504 342  
  ■  50 Contracts -- 2017-18 -- UPDATED 1779 24  
  ■  The AV Watch - Poll 895 58  
  ■  Chytil sent to Hartford 948 54  
  ■  Game 7: Pittsburgh Penguins @ New York Rangers ... 1283 270  
  ■  Game 6: New Jersey Devils @ New York Rangers 10... 1437 252  
OTG POLL

Where do you see the Rangers this season?

Stanley Cup
Cup Final
Conference Final
Division Final
Playooffs
Miss Playoffs

Previous Polls
 INJURY REPORT
There are no significant injuries to report
 
  MORE INJURY NEWS...
SEPTEMBER 24TH, 2014
CAPTION THIS
Read the submissions so far and see if you can come up with the best caption for today's photo

Best Of:
2014-15 ~ 2013-14
2012-13 ~ 2011-12
2010-11 ~ 2009-10

RUMOR MILL

Tuesday - October 25th

Either Josh Jooris (New York Daily News) or Dylan McIlrath are likely to find themselves on waivers when Pavel Buchnevich returns from back spasms.

The team is expected to cut the roster down to 22 players, and as such one of the two will need to be either moved or sent down.

  MORE RUMORS...

Question Of The Day

September 29th, 2017

How many rostered players were on the ice for opening night 2016-17

Answer...
  BIRTHDAYS

Larry Mickey - 1943
Bill Berg - 1967

  SEARCH BIRTHDAYS
  RANDOM RANGER

ALEXANDRE DAIGLE
(1999-2000)
  Born: Feb 7 - 1975  
  Pos: Center  
  GP: 58  
  G: 8  
  A: 18  
  Pts: 26  
  PIMs: 23  
 
Brad Richards would see little impact to his current contract

Players getting bad advice?
Posted by Toby Ivey ≡ 1:05:46 PM - October 19, 2012

Hey, it's Friday October 19th and we're just six days away from seeing the 82 game schedule become an impossibility.  At least according to the publicly announced position by NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman.

In the past few days we've seen the owners come up with an offer, followed by three counter offers by the NHLPA, and yet we still appear not to be heads down working on a final deal.  It's hoped that at the very least we've now got enough common ground (50/50 split of Hockey Related Revenues) to begin the process, but the mechanism remains contentious.

So if the players were to accept the owners position outright, what would be their real risks?

Under the current NHL proposal, the salary cap would drop from $70.2M this year, to $59.9M.  Over the last 10 years, the league revenues have grown at an average rate of 7.2 percent a year.  If that trend was to contine, then the salary cap figure would reach $79.1M by the end of they players' proposed five year term, and would exceed the $70.2M by the start of the 2015-16 season.

Of the 1431 players currently holding contracts, 402 (or around 28 percent) would see their contracts expire after that "break-even" point.  Another 412 would see their contract expire when the cap would be pegged at around 68.8 percent, or around 2 percent less than it is today.  In other words, close to 57 percent of the players are likely to see minimal negative impact on what they are getting paid today.

What's more at stake is how you get to that 50 percent.  The league offered to allow clubs to spend up to the original cap for 2012-13 only, in order to allow teams to prepare for a reduced number in 2013-14.  That helps the player and cap management aspect from a team's point of view, but doesn't necessarily give the players any advantage if the deferments are immediately put in place.

A couple of things that would help off-set the impact of deferments are the large number of contracts that expire after 2012-13, and the number of players who actually are more likely to spend much of their time in the minors.  A full 55 percent or 788 contracts are projected by Cap Geek as depth players, and as such they should have limited impact on the situation, even if you consider the NHLs goal of making sure certain contracts do count against the cap.

Another thing to consider is that 617 contracts - including 353 depth players - are set to expire after 2012-13, meaning they won't have as much deferment impact.  This means we should see things start to even out more quickly after the first two seasons.

Other provisions in the owners proposal probably won't help as much.  Five year contracts will mean players will get shorter terms for guaranteed income, though if you look at players who have six year or greater contracts (42) or those with seven plus years (21), you can see it's such a small minority of players who would be affected.

Adding the ability to trade cap space actually have some impact on the cap, as more teams find space to spend money.  The current cap limit is set not at a number that represents the players' share, but at the top end of a range, than an AVERAGE salary expenditure would represent the cap number.  For instance $3.3B in revenue would mean the league would have to average $55M for each team, not the proposed $59.9M, so salary trading could potentially push the average up a little.

The two year Entry Level Contract (ELC) offer by the NHL won't benefit any of the current players, and if they wanted to be selfish, they could certainly turn that down in order to slow down contract inflation that typically happens after the ELC is concluded.

An increase by one year for UFA status will perhaps a minor dampening effect on salaries who no longer can look to the open market, but the effect may be overstated, and combined with a shorter ELC, might actually lead to a similar sort of salary inflation we see today.

The bottom line is that players claiming that they the league is trying to take money out their individual pockets is not a fair representation of the situation.  Players will have to wait longer for a portion of their salary, and will see salary inflation temporarily slow down for some as the deferments are checked off, before picking up pretty much where they left off by around the fourth year of the agreement.



Profile of the Author:
Has been an active follower of the New York Rangers since the 1996-97 season. Began OutsideTheGarden.com in 2001, and has continued to collect data and provide analysis on the team through to the current day.

 Additional stories from Toby Ivey:


YOUR COMMENTS

 
October 21st, 2017
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
  1 2 3 T
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1:00pm -
Preview Game Thread
  HEADLINES
Rangers give up another early g...
- New York Daily News 10/11

Rangers coach sits veteran defe...
- New York Post 10/11

Kevin Shattenkirk cant discover...
- New York Post 10/11

Rangers assign Filip Chytil to ...
- New York Daily News 10/10

Adam Cracknell to play on Range...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Rangers send Filip Chytil to AH...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Rangers bottled up by Blues for...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Lethargic Rangers undone by ano...
- New York Post 10/10

How treasured rookie talked Ran...
- New York Post 10/10

FacebookTwitterGoogleEmailCopy ...
- New York Post 10/10

More news...
  NEXT GAMES
Saturday Oct 21st
1:00pm - Road

Monday Oct 23rd
7:00pm - Home

Thursday Oct 26th
7:00pm - Home

Saturday Oct 28th
7:00pm - Road

Tuesday Oct 31st
7:00pm - Home

Thursday Nov 2nd
7:30pm - Road

Saturday Nov 4th
7:00pm - Road

Monday Nov 6th
7:00pm - Home

Complete Schedule
  STANDINGS
  Team GP W L OT Pts  
  Maple Leafs 7 6 1 0 12  
  Lightning 7 5 1 1 11  
  Blue Jackets 6 5 1 0 10  
  Devils 6 5 1 0 10  
  Senators 6 3 1 2 8  
  Red Wings 7 4 3 0 8  
  Penguins 7 4 2 1 9  
  Flyers 6 4 2 0 8  
  Capitals 7 3 3 1 7  
  Hurricanes 4 2 1 1 5  
  Islanders 6 2 3 1 5  
  Panthers 5 2 3 0 4  
  Bruins 5 2 3 0 4  
  Sabres 7 1 4 2 4  
  Rangers 7 1 5 1 3  
  Canadiens 7 1 5 1 3  
FULL STANDINGS

About Us -  Site Map  -  Contact Us


?Copyright OutsideTheGarden.com 2001-17
This site and rolex replica uk it's content is in no way affiliated replica watches sale with, or representative rolex replica sale of the 
NHL
, NHLPA or the New York Rangers