IN THE FORUMS >> VIEWS REPLIES  
  ■  Preseason Game 3: NYR v NJD - 7:00pm MSG/MSGSN/... 165 17  
  ■  Training Camp: 19 players sent down 1111 20  
  ■  Training Camp set to start Monday 37 0  
  ■  Preseason Game 2: NYR at BOS - 7:00pm NHL/MSG/NESN 492 38  
  ■  Brooks reports Vesey coming back 1535 10  
  ■  Preseason Game 1 - NYR v NYI - 7:00pm NHLTV/MSG... 476 33  
  ■  Hajek the favorite for the sixth D spot? 390 5  
OTG POLL

How impactful will the Lundkvist situation be on the Rangers?

None
Modest
Somewhat
Significant

Previous Polls
RUMOR MILL

Friday - September 16th

Multiple sources New York Post, Lohud and New York Newsday confirmed today that Nils Lundkvist will not report for Training Camp and has asked for a Trade.

In comments (comments ) yesterday, GM Chris Drury said he wasn't sure whether Lundkvist would report, but that has been thoroughly clarified today with Lundkvist's agent Claude Lemieux making their position clear.

The loss of Lundkvist likely impacts the depth options for the team, and is the third example in the last four years of a former first round pick falling out with team management.

  MORE RUMORS...
 INJURY REPORT
There are no significant injuries to report
 
  MORE INJURY NEWS...

Question Of The Day

August 19th, 2021

Earlier this year the Rangers won by a margin of nine goals as they beat the Flyers 9-0. How many times has the margin been bigger?

Answer...
SEPTEMBER 13, 2022
CAPTION THIS
Read the submissions so far and see if you can come up with the best caption for Comments so far...
  BIRTHDAYS

Walt Tkaczuk - 1947
Rudy Poeschek - 1966

  SEARCH BIRTHDAYS
  RANDOM RANGER

NIGEL DAWES
(2006-2009)
  Born: Feb 9 - 1985  
  Position: Left Wing  
  Games Played: 121  
  Goals: 25  
  Assists: 24  
  Points: 49  
  Penalty Minutes: 25  
 
Brad Richards would see little impact to his current contract


Players getting bad advice?
Posted by Toby Ivey ≡ 1:05:46 PM - October 19, 2012

Hey, it's Friday October 19th and we're just six days away from seeing the 82 game schedule become an impossibility.  At least according to the publicly announced position by NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman.

In the past few days we've seen the owners come up with an offer, followed by three counter offers by the NHLPA, and yet we still appear not to be heads down working on a final deal.  It's hoped that at the very least we've now got enough common ground (50/50 split of Hockey Related Revenues) to begin the process, but the mechanism remains contentious.

So if the players were to accept the owners position outright, what would be their real risks?

Under the current NHL proposal, the salary cap would drop from $70.2M this year, to $59.9M.  Over the last 10 years, the league revenues have grown at an average rate of 7.2 percent a year.  If that trend was to contine, then the salary cap figure would reach $79.1M by the end of they players' proposed five year term, and would exceed the $70.2M by the start of the 2015-16 season.

Of the 1431 players currently holding contracts, 402 (or around 28 percent) would see their contracts expire after that "break-even" point.  Another 412 would see their contract expire when the cap would be pegged at around 68.8 percent, or around 2 percent less than it is today.  In other words, close to 57 percent of the players are likely to see minimal negative impact on what they are getting paid today.

What's more at stake is how you get to that 50 percent.  The league offered to allow clubs to spend up to the original cap for 2012-13 only, in order to allow teams to prepare for a reduced number in 2013-14.  That helps the player and cap management aspect from a team's point of view, but doesn't necessarily give the players any advantage if the deferments are immediately put in place.

A couple of things that would help off-set the impact of deferments are the large number of contracts that expire after 2012-13, and the number of players who actually are more likely to spend much of their time in the minors.  A full 55 percent or 788 contracts are projected by Cap Geek as depth players, and as such they should have limited impact on the situation, even if you consider the NHLs goal of making sure certain contracts do count against the cap.

Another thing to consider is that 617 contracts - including 353 depth players - are set to expire after 2012-13, meaning they won't have as much deferment impact.  This means we should see things start to even out more quickly after the first two seasons.

Other provisions in the owners proposal probably won't help as much.  Five year contracts will mean players will get shorter terms for guaranteed income, though if you look at players who have six year or greater contracts (42) or those with seven plus years (21), you can see it's such a small minority of players who would be affected.

Adding the ability to trade cap space actually have some impact on the cap, as more teams find space to spend money.  The current cap limit is set not at a number that represents the players' share, but at the top end of a range, than an AVERAGE salary expenditure would represent the cap number.  For instance $3.3B in revenue would mean the league would have to average $55M for each team, not the proposed $59.9M, so salary trading could potentially push the average up a little.

The two year Entry Level Contract (ELC) offer by the NHL won't benefit any of the current players, and if they wanted to be selfish, they could certainly turn that down in order to slow down contract inflation that typically happens after the ELC is concluded.

An increase by one year for UFA status will perhaps a minor dampening effect on salaries who no longer can look to the open market, but the effect may be overstated, and combined with a shorter ELC, might actually lead to a similar sort of salary inflation we see today.

The bottom line is that players claiming that they the league is trying to take money out their individual pockets is not a fair representation of the situation.  Players will have to wait longer for a portion of their salary, and will see salary inflation temporarily slow down for some as the deferments are checked off, before picking up pretty much where they left off by around the fourth year of the agreement.



Profile of the Author:
Has been an active follower of the New York Rangers since the 1996-97 season. Began OutsideTheGarden.com in 2001, and has continued to collect data and provide analysis on the team through to the current day.

 Additional stories from Toby Ivey:


YOUR COMMENTS

 
September 29th, 2022
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
  1 2 3  
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
7:00pm - NHL
Preview Game Thread
  HEADLINES
SEPTEMBER 29
Silly NHL rule adds another layer to Rangers' decision on young forward
How Rangers prospect Brennan Othmann's confidence, presence and skill ma...
Rangers have tricky contract problems to solve
5 thoughts after one week of Rangers' training camp
SEPTEMBER 28
Rangers stock watch: Top Risers and Fallers after 2 preseason contests
Zac Jones or Libor Hajek? Rangers won't divulge whose winning 6th and fi...
Rangers preseason stock watch: Jimmy Vesey among players on the rise
'Can't beat him, sign him': Ex-'Ranger killer' being counted on for expe...
Rangers 2022-23 season preview: Playoff chances, point projections, rost...
SEPTEMBER 27
Rangers vs. Boston Bruins: 3 big names to watch in team's second preseas...
More news...
  NEXT GAMES
Thursday Sep 29th
7:00pm - Home

PRESEASON  
Friday Sep 30th
7:00pm - Road

PRESEASON  
Wednesday Oct 5th
7:00pm - Home

PRESEASON  
Saturday Oct 8th
8:00pm - Road

PRESEASON  
Tuesday Oct 11th
7:30pm - Home

Thursday Oct 13th
8:00pm - Road

Friday Oct 14th
8:00pm - Road

Complete Schedule
  STANDINGS
  Team GP W L OT Pts  
  Panthers 82 58 18 6 122  
  Hurricanes 82 54 20 8 116  
  Maple Leafs 82 54 21 7 115  
  Rangers 82 52 24 6 110  
  Lightning 82 51 23 8 110  
  Penguins 82 46 25 11 103  
  Bruins 82 51 26 5 107  
  Capitals 82 44 26 12 100  
  Islanders 82 37 35 10 84  
  Blue Jackets 82 37 38 7 81  
  Sabres 82 32 39 11 75  
  Red Wings 82 32 40 10 74  
  Senators 82 33 42 7 73  
  Devils 82 27 46 9 63  
  Flyers 82 25 46 11 61  
  Canadiens 82 22 49 11 55  
FULL STANDINGS

About Us -  Site Map  -  Contact Us


?Copyright OutsideTheGarden.com 2001-22
This site and rolex replica uk it's content is in no way affiliated replica watches sale with, or representative rolex replica sale of the 
NHL
, NHLPA or the New York Rangers