OutsidetheGarden.com - The Fish Bowl - A Counter Proposal
  IN THE FORUMS >> VIEWS REPLIES  
  ■  50 Contracts -- 2017-18 -- 21 0  
  ■  Rangers sign Dawson Leedahl 73 0  
  ■  NHL Playoff Predictions 3632 284  
  ■  Expansion Draft Protection ... 1668 63  
  ■  Magnus Hellberg reportedly ... 104 0  
RANGERS CAP NUMBER
$74,129,726
HOME PAGE
PUCK PICKS 2012
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TEAM
ROSTER
SCHEDULE
DEPTH CHART
INJURIES
CONTRACTS
CAP STATUS
PROSPECTS
STAFF
STATISTICS
PROSPECT STATS
STANDINGS
TRANSACTIONS
DRAFT
ENTRY DRAFT
DRAFT PICKS
DRAFT HISTORY
PRESEASON
PROSPECT CAMP
TRAINING CAMP
TRAVERSE CITY
STATISTICS
NEWS & INFO
HEADLINES
LINKS
RUMOR MILL
THE GARDEN
CALENDAR
MULTIMEDIA
VIDEO
WALLPAPERS
OTG ON FACEBOOK
OTG ON TWITTER
MORE TWITTER
HISTORY
AFFILIATES
ALL TIME ROSTER
AWARDS
CAPTAINS
COACHES
GEN. MANAGERS
HALL OF FAME
LOGOS
STATISTICS
PRESIDENTS
RETIRED NUMBERS
SEASONS
OTG CONTENT
ARCHIVES
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS
NEXT STOP: 34th
OTG NOTEBOOK
RANGER BLUE
RANGER ROVER
RRANGER RICOCHET
THE FISH BOWL
OFFICIAL SITES
MSG
RANGERS
WOLF PACK
SWAMP RABBITS
NHL
NHLPA
REFERENCES
B'SHIRT BULLETIN
CAP GEEK
HOCKEY DB
HOCKEY'S FUTURE
HOCKEY RODENT
HOWLINGS
KUKLA'S KORNER
NHL NUMBERS
NY SPORTS DAY
SPECTOR'S H'KEY

New York Rangers Fan Club

by Toby Ivey

A Counter Proposal
October 4, 2004

What is there really to talk about with the NHL season on hold, the sides not talking and no real resolution in sight?  Well a potential resolution I guess, and that is what TSN with their myriad of resources and experienced commentators have presented this evening.  Basically they avoid a cap by simply putting a maximum salary on veteran players (i.e. those not on an entry-level contract) and a few tweaks here and there.  I'm sorry, but I must admit I'm disappointed...how about you?

So with the equally impressive array of resources and experience available to Outside The Garden, I counter with this more creative solution...well at least in my own mind.

1. $25 million Team Salary Cap
Okay, before all you player supporters of the players union jump on me give me a chance to explain.  The salary cap applies only to players who have changed teams and not to those who wish to remain with the team they originally signed their contract with.  In essence if a team invests the money to draft and develop a player they should be given some return on their investment, additionally we want to avoid incidents like we see in the NFL where team favorites are cut as they start to get on in years.  

Signing bonuses would have be prorated across the life of the contract with the option for the team to recognize it earlier in the life of the contract.  Other bonuses would be recognized on a year to year basis against the cap, excepting playoff bonuses which would be exempt (up to 10% of base yearly salary) per round of the playoffs.

If a team wants to keep a player then we say let them...at whatever cost they think is reasonable.

We'll even give a break to those players that remain with a team starting with a 10% reduction against the cap for each year of service beginning in their second year until they reach 100% in their 11th season.

Example salary of $5,000,000 per year for 11 seasons:

Year 1. $5,000,000 against cap
Year 2. $4,500,000 against cap
Year 3. $4,000,000 against cap
Year 4. $3,500,000 against cap
Year 5. $3,000,000 against cap
Year 6. $2,500,000 against cap
Year 7. $2,000,000 against cap
Year 8. $1,500,000 against cap
Year 9. $1,000,000 against cap
Year 10. $500,000 against cap
Year 11. $0 against cap

Fines for exceeding the cap would include a $5 to $1 penalty over the cap and a loss of draft picks comparative to the infraction.

2. Lower Unrestricted Free Agency to 28
So I gave the owners something, and now I have to give the players something back.  While we may be cutting into the ability for players to travel from team to team we should take into account that not every player wants to stay with a team.  Lowering the age to 28 means that players still have some prime years in which to make an impact and shop on the "not quite as" open market.  This change like the previous one would need to be ratcheted down gradually to the age of 28...I propose one year removed for every two years of CBA, until six years from now we're at 28.

3. Entry Level Contracts
Currently the rate is around $1.3 million, plus unrestricted bonuses and up to three years, I like the owners think this is a little too much.  Lets make it a $750,000 for the first year and $900,000 for a second year, ditching the third year completely.  The difficult part is the bonuses...perhaps we cap that at 100% of their yearly salary, it's a little fairer than the TSN solution in my opinion and the NHLPA has recognized it as an issue.

4. Restricted Free Agency
Count me as one who wonders how a player can get a raise when he actually doesn't perform...I'm fractionally more generous than TSN here and think a player should be qualified at 80% of their previous year's salary, regardless of what they earned.  I'll throw in a wrinkle though, if they're qualified at the lower rate the player can opt to get the same bonus structure as they had the previous year, perhaps not much of a return but it does give the player a little extra flexibility.

5. Arbitration
Who would have thought that arbitration would be a dirty word?  Well after the past few seasons of tremendous salary increases from year to year I think that most of us can admit the existing system needs attention.  To start with there will be a 50% maximum on raises from year to year, with a review after three years to ensure that it's not simply a case of players getting 50% raises every time they go to arbitration.  We'll leave the bonuses up to the arbiter with recommendations submitted by each side.  Teams will have the opportunity to walk away from the award and will receive compensation if another team signs the player, or will get rights to match the base salary if the player signs for 75% or less of the arbiter's award.

6. Guaranteed Contracts
This is one of the areas that teams have constantly gotten into trouble with.  Whether it be Washington signing Jagr or Phoenix signing Amonte, there has come a time when the team has regretted the move.  Still it does not seem fair to remove this guarantee if the players can command it in the market, and with the other restrictions I'm suggesting the number of big time contracts that impact a team should be reduced anyway.  The one change I will suggest is lowering the buy-out option from 66% to 50%.  Protection will remain in place for injured players who will receive 100% of their salary while injured.

7. Revenue Sharing
The problem of course is that there will always be some owners who will wish to pocket the cash rather than spend it on the team.  There is also a demotivating side-effect of pooling all the revenues into a single bucket to be split thirty ways...so here is the compromise.  First off 50% of TV revenues in each market would go into a pool to be redistributed evenly throughout the league.  The money would only go to teams which meet a minimum payroll of $30 million (regardless of cap status) with the money to cover increases of payroll over the previous season.  Some of the left over money could go to insurance costs for players and/or the players pension plan, this would need to be negotiated between the two parties.

8. Players under Contract and Roster Size
The current limits are 50 players under contract and 23 players on the NHL roster.  First off we'd like to reduce the number of players under NHL contract to 45 players and the player roster to 21 players with 18 starters.  It will eliminate 60 NHL jobs, but should also allow another 150 players to be free to negotiate with teams other than the one that drafted them and perhaps provide a mechanism for those players to find jobs with other teams in the league.  The reduction in starting rosters would have the side-effect of reducing some of the lesser skilled players in the league, pretty much eliminating the 4th line.

9. Season Length
If we're going to ask the players to take a pay cut, then we also have to reduce their workload.  The easiest way is to shorten the length of the season which in turn helps get the playoffs started while it's still cold outside.  Reducing the season from 82 games to 72 games (6 against division rivals, 4 against conference rivals and eight games against teams from the other conference) appears to be almost a foregone conclusion so there's probably not much need for debate here.

10. League Awards
As a final carrot, and this may very well be the case already, but lets give a financial bonus to players (and coaches) who win the various league sanctioned awards.

So there you have it, my ten point starting point for negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement.  It may appear on the surface that I have given too much to the owners, but there are several points here on which the owners concede either money or control over players.  The goal for me was to provide some sort of controls on the ever increasing salary expenditure, while attempting to maintain the ability for teams to retain key players on their teams.  Certainly it is far from perfect, but I feel it is far more imaginative than some of the other solutions that have been suggested and if nothing else provides some fresh ideas into a situation which obviously is not moving forward.




E-mail the author


 Additional stories from this Author:

YOUR COMMENTS

POST COMMENT >>
DATE AUTHOR COMMENT
10/6/2004 TULRangerFan NO WAY SHOULD...
10/6/2004 TULRangerFan Why...
10/8/2004 Toby A couple of replies...
10/10/2004 NYNeutronStars ufa age
10/10/2004 Toby I'm not so sure...
10/10/2004 NYNeutronStars well
10/20/2004 Frank Rizzo Management and Sather, Please fire all of them!
11/3/2004 Quincy Meyer Rangers and Future?
2/2/2016 Mark WQddaYhhxRHNOxPd
2/2/2016 Mark WQddaYhhxRHNOxPd
POST COMMENT >>
May 14th, 2017
CONSOL ENERGY CENTER
  1 2 3 T
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0:00pm -
Preview Game Thread
  NEXT GAMES
Complete Schedule
  HEADLINES
Kreider Expected Back As Ranger...
- CBS New York 11/18

Mats Zuccarello's Rangers Resur...
- New York Post 11/18

Chris Kreider returns to practi...
- New York Newsday 11/17

Blue Jackets notebook | Dubinsk...
- Columbus Dispatch 11/17

Rangers Roll, but not Without I...
- The Hockey Writers 11/17

Prospect Update: Halverson Gets...
- New York Rangers 11/17

Kreider Returns to Rangers Prac...
- New York Rangers 11/17

Rangers Assign Cristoval Nieves...
- New York Rangers 11/17

Kreider to practice with Ranger...
- New York Daily News 11/17

Rangers can finally exhale with...
- New York Post 11/17

More news...



October 14th, 2016

Who was the last #40 to score a goal for NYR before Grabner?

Answer...
  STANDINGS
  Team GP W L OT Pts  
  Capitals 82 55 19 8 118  
  Penguins 82 50 21 11 111  
  Blue Jackets 82 50 24 8 108  
  Canadiens 82 47 26 9 103  
  Rangers 82 48 28 6 102  
  Senators 82 44 28 10 98  
  Bruins 82 44 31 7 95  
  Maple Leafs 82 40 27 15 95  
  Islanders 82 41 29 12 94  
  Lightning 82 42 30 10 94  
  Flyers 82 39 33 10 88  
  Hurricanes 82 36 31 15 87  
  Panthers 82 35 36 11 81  
  Red Wings 82 33 36 13 79  
  Sabres 82 33 37 12 78  
  Devils 82 28 40 14 70  
FULL STANDINGS
  RANDOM RANGER

REM MURRAY
(2001-2003)
  Born: Oct 9 - 1972  
  Pos: Left Wing  
  GP: 43  
  G: 7  
  A: 8  
  Pts: 15  
  PIMs: 8  

About Us -  Site Map  -  Contact Us


© Copyright OutsideTheGarden.com 2001-17
This site and it's content is in no way affiliated with, or representative of the 
NHL
, NHLPA or the New York Rangers