OutsidetheGarden.com - The Fish Bowl - Day One...
  IN THE FORUMS >> VIEWS REPLIES  
  ■  OT: Other Sports 3367 423  
  ■  Game 8: New York Islanders ... 1504 342  
  ■  50 Contracts -- 2017-18 -- ... 1779 24  
  ■  The AV Watch - Poll 895 58  
  ■  Chytil sent to Hartford 948 54  
RANGERS CAP NUMBER
$73,204,820
HOME PAGE
PUCK PICKS 2012
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TEAM
ROSTER
SCHEDULE
DEPTH CHART
INJURIES
CONTRACTS
CAP STATUS
PROSPECTS
STAFF
STATISTICS
PROSPECT STATS
STANDINGS
TRANSACTIONS
DRAFT
ENTRY DRAFT
DRAFT PICKS
DRAFT HISTORY
PRESEASON
PROSPECT CAMP
TRAINING CAMP
TRAVERSE CITY
STATISTICS
NEWS & INFO
HEADLINES
LINKS
RUMOR MILL
THE GARDEN
CALENDAR
MULTIMEDIA
VIDEO
WALLPAPERS
OTG ON FACEBOOK
OTG ON TWITTER
MORE TWITTER
HISTORY
AFFILIATES
ALL TIME ROSTER
AWARDS
CAPTAINS
COACHES
GEN. MANAGERS
HALL OF FAME
LOGOS
STATISTICS
PRESIDENTS
RETIRED NUMBERS
SEASONS
OTG CONTENT
ARCHIVES
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS
NEXT STOP: 34th
OTG NOTEBOOK
RANGER BLUE
RANGER ROVER
RRANGER RICOCHET
THE FISH BOWL
OFFICIAL SITES
MSG
RANGERS
WOLF PACK
SWAMP RABBITS
NHL
NHLPA
REFERENCES
B'SHIRT BULLETIN
CAP GEEK
HOCKEY DB
HOCKEY'S FUTURE
HOCKEY RODENT
HOWLINGS
KUKLA'S KORNER
NHL NUMBERS
NY SPORTS DAY
SPECTOR'S H'KEY

New York Rangers Fan Club

by Toby Ivey

Day One...
September 16, 2004

Well so much for optimism huh?  NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman elected to implement a lockout of the players at 12:00am last night, and although he didn't need it, all thirty owners voted to support his decision, making clear their intentions to implement a cap of payrolls in the NHL.  In hindsight it appeared that the decision to go to war was accepted a long time ago by both sides, a revelation that is only that much more frustrating to we the fans when you consider how long this has been brewing.

While both sides have made nominal attempts to bridge the gap, the lines have been drawn and neither side is willing to budge much, at least not until the stakes have become higher than they already were.  At the center of the debate is the degree at which the league is losing money.  The owners claim 75% of their revenues go towards paying players, while also claiming that the Rangers accounted for 40 million dollars of losses last season in order to support their argument.  On the other side is a union of millionaires who are looking to make a "decent living".

Okay, it's fair to say that there's been plenty of exaggeration on both sides, but behind the exaggeration and spin there is truth, the NHLPA's proposal admits as much, though perhaps gets a little optimistic with some of the numbers it presents.  The problem of course is multi-faceted and the longer this debate goes on, the more facts will arise.

The NHL leads the way when it comes to bankrupt teams and shaky ownership.  From Harold Baldwin's questionable business practices that mortgaged the Penguins future in exchange for a few quick bucks to the convictions of Buffalo Sabres owner John Rigas and Islanders prospective owner John Spano, the NHL has been shown to be too willing to let owners put franchises in trouble.  Not to mention addition of nine franchises in the past 20 years...eight of them under the twelve year reign of Commissioner Gary Bettman.

But according to Bettman, the real killer has been salaries that have risen from around 60% of revenues to around 75% in the past 10 years, and while there's no doubt that there is some question about the exact numbers, it seems fair to suggest that there is some truth to the claim.  Ten years ago the league was a much different place, there was no unrestricted free agency, arbitration didn't exist and the players had little leverage to compete in the market. .

Even when the Players Association gained the concession to unrestricted free agency at 32 (changing to 31 at the end of the 1997-98 season) there appeared to be little consequence, as many players retired in their early thirties at the time.  Even a cap on entry level contracts that started at $850,000 in 1995 and ratcheted up to over the 1.2 million dollar mark in the most recent years seemed like a plus rather than a minus.

Oh what a wonderful thing hindsight is...

The first inklings of a problem came about in the late 90s, when general managers new to the UFA market started offering substantial sums to players who were past their prime.  The league had inadvertently created a burgeoning market for 31+ year olds that quickly saw salaries sky rocket as a select few teams looked for quick fixes to maintain their competitiveness.  The madness ultimately spread far beyond those few and even into the restricted free agent market, where players suddenly found leverage in holding out and forcing trades and/or salary increases.  Contract lengths and terms were being written on a sellers terms and the mess was being cleaned up by the likes of the New York Rangers, Toronto Maple Leafs and Philadelphia Flyers who were only to willing to accept the overpriced cast offs from other franchises.

As for arbitration, instead of being an objective evaluation of a players abilities and worth, the process became little more than a process for splitting the difference between a club and a player...almost always including a substantial raise.  And then of course there was the entry level contracts that were being written on an ever increasing basis at the maximum, and the need to hand out a 10% raise to players just to keep their rights, regardless of how they had performed in the previous season.

In hindsight the system was flawed...

The end result is a salary structure that exaggerates some of the natural inequalities between markets, gradually squeezing out the smaller markets, or at the very least forcing them to move.  If left unchecked, the league could theoretically kill off franchises and consequently the fans that support those lost teams...a situation that might have a reverberating effect as interest and confidence in the league changes.  At least that's what the owners might contend.

The Players might also point out that several teams have successfully changed ownership in recent years and that there are owners in the wings waiting to purchase a franchise.  What they might neglect to mention however, is that three franchises have been forced to relocate in the past 10 years (Hartford, Winnipeg and Quebec) and that only Colorado has really secured financial stability in their new market.  The threat still remains over Edmonton and Pittsburgh, while Buffalo and Ottawa were saved only by deep pocketed owners, not by an improved business model.

So what about the options...

The owners have put forward a hard cap salary proposal as the core piece of their solution.  Ultimately it represents a way of controlling the bigger franchises and their spending habits in a way that allows the smaller markets to survive financially.  It is all about protecting ALL 30 existing franchises from each other and the league from itself, and the owners will argue, that by protecting the league the players very positions within that league are protected...albeit at a price.

The players for their part have countered with a less unilateral approach, favoring a multi-part package that does not outright prevent spending, but penalizes (and redistributes the "taxes") those who decide to exceed the guidelines.  They include revenue sharing which would help distribute some of the wealth of the bigger markets to those of the smaller markets...a kind of social security for NHL teams.  The biggest problem of course is how those monies would be handed back to owners in need, something that has not worked well in Major League Baseball where owners pocket rather than spend their share.

In theory both solutions should be able to be employed equitably if one or the other side was willing to compromise, but there's the rub.  With both parties unwilling to "go over to the other side" lest they appear weak, we are left at a seemingly interminable impasse.  There is also additional motivation for the owners to force the Players Association's hand, and perhaps create a system not unlike that of the NFL, while avoiding the possibility of a much more powerful organization akin to that found in Major League Baseball.

Under such a scenario the owners would be able to craft an even more favorable solution, eliminating guaranteed contracts, maintaining the existing rights to a player or even rewinding some of the changes implemented in the previous CBA.  The owners have more to gain, the players more to lose.

Still a cap does open up some additional concerns...

Slowing down (or winding back salaries) allows the Europe to better compete in terms of salaries with the NHL.  While the stars would still likely make their way to the NHL, their remains the distinct possibility of the second and third tier players remaining or even moving to Europe, where salaries would continue to grow further depleting the talent pool.  It's possible that the NHL could reduce roster sizes to compensate with the NHLPA out of the picture, but the individual club's position on such an eventuality remains unclear.

A cap also does not protect against rogue owners, bad business decisions or even investment in the market...something that seems unlikely to be addressed in any fashion while the attention is focused on salaries.

Where does that leave us?

Unfortunately we, the fans of hockey are considered a hardy and loyal bunch, both sides feel that the majority of fans will return and it appears the league in particular believes that a healthier league in financial terms will do more for keeping the existing fans than the alternative.  The bottom line...if the players don't blink, then there will be no hockey in 2004-05.

 


E-mail the author


 Additional stories from this Author:

YOUR COMMENTS

POST COMMENT >>
DATE AUTHOR COMMENT
None
POST COMMENT >>
October 21st, 2017
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN
  1 2 3 T
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1:00pm -
Preview Game Thread
  NEXT GAMES
Saturday Oct 21st
1:00pm - Road

Monday Oct 23rd
7:00pm - Home

Thursday Oct 26th
7:00pm - Home

Saturday Oct 28th
7:00pm - Road

Tuesday Oct 31st
7:00pm - Home

Thursday Nov 2nd
7:30pm - Road

Saturday Nov 4th
7:00pm - Road

Monday Nov 6th
7:00pm - Home

Complete Schedule
  HEADLINES
Rangers give up another early g...
- New York Daily News 10/11

Rangers coach sits veteran defe...
- New York Post 10/11

Kevin Shattenkirk cant discover...
- New York Post 10/11

Rangers assign Filip Chytil to ...
- New York Daily News 10/10

Adam Cracknell to play on Range...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Rangers send Filip Chytil to AH...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Rangers bottled up by Blues for...
- New York Newsday 10/10

Lethargic Rangers undone by ano...
- New York Post 10/10

How treasured rookie talked Ran...
- New York Post 10/10

FacebookTwitterGoogleEmailCopy ...
- New York Post 10/10

More news...



September 29th, 2017

How many rostered players were on the ice for opening night 2016-17

Answer...
  STANDINGS
  Team GP W L OT Pts  
  Maple Leafs 7 6 1 0 12  
  Lightning 7 5 1 1 11  
  Blue Jackets 6 5 1 0 10  
  Devils 6 5 1 0 10  
  Senators 6 3 1 2 8  
  Red Wings 7 4 3 0 8  
  Penguins 7 4 2 1 9  
  Flyers 6 4 2 0 8  
  Capitals 7 3 3 1 7  
  Hurricanes 4 2 1 1 5  
  Islanders 6 2 3 1 5  
  Panthers 5 2 3 0 4  
  Bruins 5 2 3 0 4  
  Sabres 7 1 4 2 4  
  Rangers 7 1 5 1 3  
  Canadiens 7 1 5 1 3  
FULL STANDINGS
  RANDOM RANGER

AL ROLLINS
(1959-1960)
  Born: Oct 9 - 1928  
  Pos: Goaltender  
  GP: 10  
  Rec: 3-4-3  
  SO: 0  
  GAA: 3.10  
  Sv%: -  

About Us -  Site Map  -  Contact Us


© Copyright OutsideTheGarden.com 2001-17
This site and replica watches sale it's content is in no way rolex replica sale affiliated with, or representative rolex replica uk of the 
NHL
, NHLPA or the New York Rangers