I Concur

A Brooks article and it is time. Kreiders numbers and, do nothing but have pucks go in off him when they do, is killing the PP. Lafreniere has more overall game in his left one than Kreider has in his entire body. Kreider has some terrible numbers and is probably the singular thing dragging down the PP. Here is the article..
If there is one thing we have seen from Peter Laviolette in his first season behind the Rangers bench, it is that the head coach does not panic easily. He does not overreact.
That has been true both in the good times of an 18-4-1 start and in the bad times of a 13-12-2 mark over the past two months.
Laviolette talks about the long view and the inevitable peaks and valleys of a season. The message has been absorbed by the players, who often repeat it in their sessions with the press.
Forward lines have been allowed to gestate. Changes in personnel and alignment generally have been dictated by physical issues.
Fifty games into the season, the patient approach has produced but a handful of strategic changes within the lineup. Those primarily have addressed: a)the right wing spot on the Chris Kreider-Mika Zibanejad connection, where Blake Wheeler and Kaapo Kakko have flipped and flopped; and b) the composition of the fourth line, which has become constant with Barclay Goodrow skating between Jimmy Vesey and Tyler Pitlick.
But it may be time for Laviolette and Michael Peca, the assistant coachpresiding over the power-play unit, to consider changing up the alignment of the top unit that not only is failing to produce but is short-circuiting energy and stunting momentum.
A power play thatappeared an immovable forcethrough the season’s first two months has become an invisible object through the team’s extended travails, which have seen the club blanked in 10 of the past 17 games following a stretch in which it scored in 11 of 12 contests.
Lack of power-play production only highlights the club’s chronic issues at five-on-five, the Rangers having scored two goals or fewer in eight of their past 11 games coming offMonday’s 2-1 overtime victory over Colorado.
The team still is ranked third in the league at 27 percent efficiency, but it had been humming at around 33 percent through the Christmas break. That is the kind of number that is required to maintain a hold on playoff position for a team that ranks 22nd in the league with 2.45 goals per 60:00 at five-on-five.
Again, though, it’s not that the power play has gone into a slump. By nature, power plays are streaky.
The overriding issue is that PP1 is leaving the situation worse than when it came on the ice. Of course, the group consists of the club’s best offensive players, so when they struggle with the man advantage,it can bleed into their overall game.
You might call that a double whammy.
Too much of a good thing?
The template for this power-play unit was established by former head coach David Quinn around Thanksgiving of 2019-20, his second year behind the bench. He had four righties in Zibanejad, Artemi Panarin, Ryan Strome and defenseman Tony DeAngelo with one lefty in Kreider.
Once it was formed, that unit clicked at close to 30 percent for the season. The Blueshirts unexpectedly charged into playoff contention following Igor Shesterkin’s promotion the first week of January and indeed received an invitation to the 24-team Cup tournament held in the bubble during the pandemic.
The first week of the following season, Adam Fox replaced DeAngelo. And last season, Vincent Trocheck supplanted Strome. But the idea has remained pretty much the same.
The Rangers’ first unit has been on for all but three of the club’s 41 power-play goals, the second unit last having scored on Dec. 19 in Toronto. Of course, the second unit, which lately has consisted of Alexis Lafreniere, Blake Wheeler, Kaapo Kakko, Jonny Brodzinski and Erik Gustafsson, gets negligible time.
Fox was sidelined 10 games in November due to a lower body injury, but his four PP1 cohorts have gotten between 177:07 and 182:39 with the man advantage. Lafreniere, who has been the one staple on PP2 from the start of the season, has been on for 62:25 with the extra man. (The second group did hop on for an offensive zone draw with 55 seconds still on the clock during Monday’s lone power play against Colorado.)
Tough questions
Lafreniere is the logical candidate to move into the first unit, but at whose expense? Trocheck’smastery at the dotshas been an important ingredient in the unit’s success. Lafreniere is not replacing Fox, so then it would be Kreider, Zibanejad or Panarin.
By the way, someone is going to have to explain to me how Kreider has scored only one power-play goal in his past 22 games after getting eight in the first 28. Moreover, someone is going to have to explain why No. 20 doesn’t get more touches.
It is curious enough that Kreider has only one shot on the power play over the past eight games. It is stunning that the shot came on his only attempt over the past eight games. No deflections wide. No deflections blocked. One shot. One attempt.
Good luck with that.
Actually, I’m quite sure I don’t.
I’m not sure I understand that.
Actually, I’m quite sure I don’t.
The Rangers — and Kreider — need to fix this.

I think for me the primary issue is that the Rangers are not really creating space with their current approach. A lot of perimeter passing, typically followed by a forced-pass or forced-shot that ends in a turnover.
Not enough movement, and thus lanes (both shooting and passing) aren't opening up.
Other teams also have learned that the power play has operated on having that extra half-second of time to make a decision, and have defenders immediately pressure the puck carrier, which makes them less effective.
While I'm not averse to changing up the mix with Laf in for Kreider, I don't think it's as simple as Kreider is the cause by any stretch...or even that he's the main cause.
Bottom line is that every season, the PP devolves into setting up a one-timer from Zibanejad or a deflection from Kreider. Neither is working right now and I'm not sure how much is on the players for not executing or opposing teams have figured out how to neutralize them.

Posted by: @AnonymousBottom line is that every season, the PP devolves into setting up a one-timer from Zibanejad or a deflection from Kreider. Neither is working right now and I'm not sure how much is on the players for not executing or opposing teams have figured out how to neutralize them.
Much more concise than my post, but yes...I agree

My apologies to Fish and C who commented but I missed copying and pasting this part near the end of the article. I have put it in now so it’s the full article. And those numbers are staggeringly atrocious. And he does very little legwork and battling. He does so little. Definitely not any solution unless his return in a trade helps.
“”By the way, someone is going to have to explain to me how Kreider has scored only one power-play goal in his past 22 games after getting eight in the first 28. Moreover, someone is going to have to explain why No. 20 doesn’t get more touches.
It is curious enough that Kreider has only one shot on the power play over the past eight games. It is stunning that the shot came on his only attempt over the past eight games. No deflections wide. No deflections blocked. One shot. One attempt.””

My Concerns are:
5v5 scoring
5 v 5 Defensive coverage
Goaltending
team toughness
Laf needs to prove he can finish more consistently
If they need me to bleed, then I'll bleed for my team

For my mind, I don't think Lafreniere has to finish more consistently to get a shot, and playing on the PP may actually help his even strength offense...it's one of the big differences in how he's been treated versus other 1OA picks, and he seems to understand a bit more now what it takes, and so I think it might be interesting to see what effect it might have.
As for the underlying problem, I think that additional paragraph about Kreider not getting shots really just underscores my earlier point. It's either he's not getting open, or the lanes aren't opening. My initial thought is that the Rangers are too predictable, and haven't been fast or accurate, which has allowed the defenders to cheat...and so pucks aren't getting to Kreider. You can also further argue that for the most part the Rangers don't score off the rush on the PP, and prefer to setup...and some of the few rush chances have seen Kreider as the passer (like Trocheck's most recent PP goal from out west if I recall correctly).
It's not my job to fix the PP, but when it's humming, they're moving and the puck is moving...making it hard for the defenders. Now it's 5 guys standing around for the most part...or maybe 3 guys standing relatively still, with little misdirection, and then the passes aren't going cleanly to the stick, which then slows it down more. Partly in their heads, partly execution. I think these guys have it within them to fix this, but it might take more psychology than coaching at this point, so why not change things up a bit to maybe get them thinking a bit differently
Never would have guessed back on opening night that the 3 best Rangers at this point of the season would be Trocheck, Panarin and Quick.

@fish But he continues to stand at the side of the net away from enemy dmen and do nothing.
Posted by: @Anonymous@fish But he continues to stand at the side of the net away from enemy dmen and do nothing.
This. Kreider has devolved from a net front presence to a net side presence. It just seems he doesn’t want to get “dirty.” Instead of taking the goalie’s eyes away he parks off to the side which makes the play way easier for the goalie to read. He’s the reason I just bought one of those sponge “TV Bricks.” He’s a really big dude but he plays like a midget.
Latest Post: Rangers sign Conor Sheary Our newest member: Anarion Recent Posts Unread Posts Tags
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed